Mass General Virtual Visits Program
“
Fewer Visits in Virtual Group: Patients in the virtual visit group had 0.8 fewer primary care visits than those in the usual care group (95% CI, −1.2 to −0.3).
”

Levine et al. (2018). Association of Structured Virtual Visits for Hypertension Follow-Up in Primary Care with Blood Pressure Control and Use of Clinical Services. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-018-4375-0
Journal of General Internal Medicine“
Subgroup Analysis for Unsatisfactory SBP Control: For patients with unsatisfactory SBP control, there were 1.4 fewer primary care visits in the virtual visit group compared to the usual care group (95% CI, 0.3 to 2.5).
”

Levine et al. (2018). Association of Structured Virtual Visits for Hypertension Follow-Up in Primary Care with Blood Pressure Control and Use of Clinical Services. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-018-4375-0
Journal of General Internal Medicine“
Physicians were on average extremely satisfied with the clinical decision-making capabilities of the virtual visit tool. Physician satisfaction with receiving sufficient data to make a diagnosis, order tests, change medications, and make referrals ranged from 4.32 to 4.53/5 (SE= 0.06–0.09). Satisfaction with the diagnostic capability was 4.60/5 (SE= 0.07). Overall satisfaction was 4.47/5 (SE= 0.08).
”

Dixon & Lau (2014). Asynchronous Virtual Visits for the Follow-Up of Chronic Conditions. Telemedicine and e-Health. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/tmj.2013.0211
Telemedicine and e-Health